Monday, February 27, 2017

THE RULE OF REGULATION


 Most governmental agencies survive not by the good they provide but by getting budget approval for their continuation.  To increase their longevity it is absolutely necessary to create the appearance of being something we can’t do without.  The EPA is a sterling example of an agency allowed to run amok and there are thousands of citizens that have felt the damage of being over regulated.  It is time for sanity to take over the controls.  Agencies, under the constitution, are not the law makers.
The “fake news”, that President Trump has been “trumptweeting” about has tried to restate Mr. Bannons Q&A at C-Pac as the administrations attempt to dismantle our entire government.  Once again proving the Presidents point of view as being valid.
Bannons comment regarding deconstruction of the regulatory system is not the same as translated by the Daily Kos.  This is a prime example of what President Trump is railing about.  There is intent behind the choices made on Trumps cabinet that is a fact.  He is striving to get our country back on the track of the rule of law.  The giant bureaucracies that have done so much in our country to inhibit individual rights have just been called out.  The idea of most, originally, was to make sure that the rule of law was being followed.  Over the course of time, each of them has taken over the job of congress, which is the passing of laws.  We are at a point in our republic that dictates our lives not by rule of law but by regulation.  The purpose of some of the regulations used by bureaucracy mandates is not so much for the public good as it is for the survival of the individual agency involved under the guise of good.  That is the object of attack, and it is much needed.
It always amazes me how the progressive liberal faction in our country is in such ideological lock step, regardless of actual reality and effect policies might have.  We are watching a form of insanity play out on our tv’s, our computers, and our phones.  We are seeing the efforts of some liberal educators to propagandize both history and current events, and what adds to the effect of that propaganda is that most actually believe what they are pouring into those young minds.  What is really terrible is that generations of our society will end of dealing with the effects of their ability to revise actual history, to revise our language, and to mis-interpret current events in order to advance a false narrative.
While the original purpose, of establishing an agency to carry out legislated law, was similar to creating a department within a company it has morphed into a system of pure bureaucracy.  Interesting result when I looked up the actual definition of that word. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bureaucracy  gives more than one definition and none of them sound as if our elected body of legislators have any part in the kind of, or number of regulations enacted.
bu·reauc·ra·cy 

1.
a. Administration of a government chiefly through bureaus or departments staffed with nonelected officials.
b. The departments and their officials as a group: promised to reorganize the federal bureaucracy.
2.
a. Management or administration marked by hierarchical authority among numerous offices and by fixed procedures: The new department head did not know much about bureaucracy.
b. The administrative structure of a large or complex organization: a midlevel manager in a corporate bureaucracy.
3. An administrative system in which the need or inclination to follow rigid or complex procedures impedes effective action: innovative ideas that get bogged down in red tape and bureaucracy.
bu•reauc•ra•cy
1. government by a rigid hierarchy of bureaus, administrators, and petty officials.
2. a body of officials and administrators, esp. in a government.
3. excessive multiplication of, and concentration of power in, bureaus or administrators.
4. administration characterized by excessive red tape and routine. 

Operating under the guise of protecting our people these agencies are able to control and to affect almost every phase of our lives in a country created to give our people freedom.
It has been said that there is always a faction of humanity that seeks to control.  That is very seldom accomplished with a prism of transparency. 
Just a thought in passing: How transparent is the current administration?  How transparent was the last administration?
Pray that God gives our people the gift of discernment, that we may be able to differentiate between fact and fiction.
God Bless the USA

Monday, February 20, 2017

MANIPULATED MADNESS


Just to get things straight, Mr. Trump, the news media is charged with giving us, the citizens of our country, the news about our government and its actions and misactions.  Their current displeasure with you for calling them out to be a bunch of deceiving lying miscreants has reached the heights of ranting and raving.  Similar to the craziness they have accused you of exhibiting, they are beside themselves with haughtiness and have joined ranks to force you into compliance with what used to be the norm.  They claim they have an absolute right to question you regarding your governmental actions, as well as anything personal, that may have an effect on our nation.  They are correct in that thought.  I am having a hard time finding any way to deny that right, as well as any record of you denying it.  Regarding the possibility of them lying, I am tempted to search out the meaning (of “what is is”).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When started writing this it occurred that I should define some of the words I planned on using.  Since Mr. Trump is intent on calling the news folks “fake news” and labeling them as a danger to our country it seemed that I should find out for sure what the News should be.

Now, for myself, I thought the News would and should be something I could rely on for information.  If I, or anyone, were in a position of relying on the news as part of the decision-making process it should be fact based.  In searching the intimidable google for the definition of “news” the words “truth or fact” were not of the description.  This is not the definition of news that I expected to find as a part of journalism.  Like in every aspect of life there is something that has to be a part of any professional endeavor, even journalism, and that is ethics.  Ethically the use of objective, non-nuanced reporting is, and should be, a part of any reportage claiming to be a news report.  That degree of professionalism is sadly missing from most of the news media in action today.  I use the word action because by observation I have seen what I used to trust, morph into something I abhor.  It is no longer objective news that we are getting.  Instead, it is more like we are being subjected to a never ending barrage of mind swaying tone and chosen content.  It’s like deception and propaganda are now disguised as news.

Most of us in the general population don’t always get the nuance of our own written language, but those professionals who write the articles and especially the headlines are masters of creating a mental climate.  How many times are we attracted to an article by a headline that bears little or no semblance to the articles factual content?  It’s not the article that will stick in the minds of the quick scanning public, it is the idea pushed by the headline.  Is that lying? Questionable to be sure, but it is definitely misleading those who rely on it for information.

To read the headlines, and listen to the majority of the media outlets, Mr. Trump held a news conference in which he was totally out of control, ranting, raving and for some media personnel, he was mentally unhinged.  Now I have watched this news conference, the one in which he called out the media, and I just didn’t find the segment where this POTUS was deranged.  Could it be that the “HYPE” is on?  I heard numerous Senators, both Red and Blue stating that Mr. Trump was tyrannical and trying to silence the press, preventing them from holding him accountable.  I listened to the conference many times, and again I couldn’t find any support for that point of view.  Some even went so far as to claim him to be one of the most unAmerican Presidents of all time. Rubbish!

What Mr. Trump, our President, did say was that he relished the questions but what he objects to is the misleading coverage of his activity as POTUS.  I’m not sure how that position is that of a tyrant, a dictator or of someone ruling a third world country.  Which is just one more example of what he’s talking about.  If anyone is capable of reading, seeing or listening they would have to know that the media is very strong on giving us the impression the Trump is a buffoon, a power hungry miscreant intent on ruling the world as a king.  Unfortunately, there are many “fastnews” feeders that buy into the propaganda like faux news reporting.  There is a public mania within our population is being groomed, by every propaganda method known by the professional misleaders,  and it is designed to stop the “TrumpTrain” in its tracks.  We have politicians, entertainers, educators and our neighbors raising the level of fear much the same as those old lynch mob rabble rousers of the old west did.  All it takes is the small seed of rumor to start an avalanche of false information that is sucked up by our nation of Trump haters.  Those who would see our system of government and our productive society fail are gleefully stoking the fires of discontent and there is a large portion of our population willing to throw more gas on the fire.

There is no doubt that between the tweets and the ignored practice of politically correct “polititalk” used by the normal politician, Mr. Trump gives ample ammunition for his detractors.  Couple that with the hysteria created by the press and educators misleading use of our language, there is a great disservice being perpetrated upon our society and our nation.  Even that fact is being disguised as being evil name calling by our President.  It’s no wonder that a large portion of those demonstrating their Trump anger, have been motivated not by fact but what they have been led to believe. 

America, all of us need to start reading and hearing between the lines and noticing what is not being said as well as what is.  We need to start listening to what is said as well as watching the actions that are being taken.  We need to search out the facts rather than buying into the fertilizer that is being dumped on our perceptions.

Lord, Open the eyes and ears of our people and give them the gift of discernment.

God bless the U.S.A and our President

Thursday, February 2, 2017

HOW WAS SCHOOL TODAY?


Led by misinformation, hyperbole, naivety and a heightened need to be relevant and heard by all on the planet, students rioted again last night.  Without a doubt in my mind, I’m sure many were acting in good faith according to the beliefs and norms of the age and time.  I am also sure that a fair number of them were acting out of a propagandized set of beliefs instilled in their minds by the educational system that says our constitutional right of freedom of speech and the right to assemble allows them to act as anarchists.  These young minds are hungry for motives that will give them relevance in the world around them.  To be part of a movement, any movement, gives them a place of inclusiveness and a part of something larger than just themselves.  It’s always nice to feel important, wiser and smarter than those ignorant of the new way of the world.

Those young minds have been under intense schooling by the same frame of mind that helped defeat the United States in the Vietnam war.  I’m not going to say right or wrong result but I am going to say that many of those entered the educational system with the intent of a long term change in the American way of life.  They know what methods will be most effective in that respect. They know that pushing their agenda and appealing to the idealistic minds of the young open mind will be far more fruitful than open warfare. Sadly, we are seeing the effects of the riots, called protests of our time.  While most Americans were busy working and trying to preserve our way of life those, such as George Soros, were equally hard at work stealing generations of our people.  We were too busy to notice until “FREEDOM OF SPEECH UNDER ATTACK?”
Change is an inevitable part of existence at every level of being in our world, but unlike the majority, Humans have a choice in their effect on what changes they will endure.  We have developed by reaching out for a higher state of existence throughout our time.  We are always idealistically wanting to be a kinder, gentler kind of human.  We always want others to perceive us at our moral best as individuals and as a society.  A point of being that all others should emulate.  We always know best and it’s our place to help the world conform to our way of thinking, acting, and speaking. Those who would defeat our way of life have learned how to turn those strivings into a weapon and we are seeing the fruition of their labor.  It has taken those folks fifty some years to get the desired results out of using our educational, entertainment and media against us in this war of words.  Welcome to the new set of indoctrinated “Vietnam war Protests”.  Many now believe that the new world order is under the unification of peoples regardless of belief systems, cultural norms, race and religion.  That is the impression, not true in reality.  The real goal is domination by a few over the rest of us who will believe whatever makes us feel relevant and congruent with the highest order of humanity. 

We are witnessing the largest misuse of minds in the history of mankind, and if allowed to continue, it will set humanity back generations of achievement.

Our freedom of speech has been curtailed and weakened by perception.  Shouting matches that use name calling and labeling rather than fact and logical opinion have taken over the discussion.  Political correctness has instilled a fear inhibiting expression that might be deemed unacceptable. We are witnessing the misuse of the systems we used to rely on for information and learning.  Fact is being infected with ideology and purposeful intent and we are now basing our actions and beliefs on tainted information.  The recent years have been plagued with protests turned into riots.  Protests that are much like what the old west used to call lynch mobs only this time the “rabble rousers” are functioning worldwide.  The method of causing a feeling of discontent, anger against perceived injustice and the need to appear better and above others has been very effective. 

We need to step back and take a deep breath of mental refreshing review of history.  The liberal progressive movement has perfected the ability to use our good motives to change history; rewriting it to suit their cause.  Most recent is the use of partial truths to show our recent change in government management as an evil agent has been quite successful in creating a hysteria resulting in mob activity.  Those of us who oppose this new world order need to fight this battle.  We do not need to use hard force but we need to defeat it with the same weapons that brought this malignancy upon us.  We need to make changes to our educational system, we need to take back our schools, our government and our news gathering systems. 

At this point our dissenting and protesting students need to review the actual history of one of their favorite accusatory names, Fascist and Nazi.

One of the first things this group did at the onset in Germany was to inhibit free speech through labeling other people and through the rewritting of historical fact.  Way to go educators you are truly the epitomy of shameful.

God Bless our country, our people and our government.  Give us the power of discernment Lord and the healing of our society.

IMMIGRATION PAUSE BUTTON

QUOTED FROM: HTTP://WWW.DAILYWIRE.COM/NEWS/12895/8-THINGS-YOU-NEED-KNOW-ABOUT-TRUMPS-EXECUTIVE-BEN-SHAPIRO

8 Things You Need To Know About Trump's Executive Order On Refugees, Immigration
Late on Friday afternoon, President Trump signed an executive order significantly cracking down on entry into the United States by citizens from Muslim countries Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. It quickly fell under fire from the media, which suggested that Trump was doing something unprecedented, racist, Islamophobic, and utterly horrifying. Then, on Saturday, a New York federal judge put a stay on the order.

So, what do you need to know about the order?
1. Trump Invokes 9/11. The executive order states that the visa-issuance process needs review because of failures leading up to 9/11, and further attacks afterward. It is true that there have been a bevy of high-profile terror attacks on American soil from refugees and others approved by the American visa system: the Boston Marathon bombing; the Ohio State terror attack; the St. Cloud, Minnesota machete attack; the New York/New Jersey bombing attacks in September 2016. Here’s a fuller listing. The executive order states, “The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law.”
2. The Order Suspends Visas From “Nationals of Countries of Particular Origin.” The Secretary of Homeland Security, as well as the Secretary of State and Director of National Intelligence, are tasked under the order with determining the standard necessary for visa entry within 30 days. All entry into the United States is suspended, “as immigrants and nonimmigrants, of such persons for 90 days from the date of this order.” This isn’t unprecedented – Jimmy Carter issued a cancelation of visas for Iranian citizens in 1980.
3. More Countries May Be Coming. Under the executive order, the Secretary of State is told to request information from foreign governments in accordance with the report of the DHS and DNI. The DHS and Secretary of State are then told to come up with a list of additional countries that aren’t fulfilling their informational obligations.
4. The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security Can Waive The Executive Order For Individuals. Under Section 3(g), they can “on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked.”
5. Refugees Are Blocked For 120 Days. Syrian Refugees Are Banned Indefinitely. Under the order, the Secretary of State is told to suspend the US Refugee Admissions program for 120 days to “review the USRAP application and adjudication process.Syrian refugees are labeled “detrimental to the interests of the United States” until the process is revamped.
6. Priority Is Given To Victims of Religious-Based Persecution. The media has labeled the order Islamophobic based on this provision, but here’s what it actually says:
Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.
As David French points out at National Review, the current definition of refugee under law states, “any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality . . . and who is unable or unwilling to return to . . . that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of . . . religion [among other things].” This executive order isn’t a major change to that standard, and it is designed to give priority to Syrian Christian refugees who have largely been left high and dry by the Obama administration.
7. The Order Limits The Number Of Refugees in 2017 to 50,000. The media’s been going nuts over this one, but this is well in line with prior refugee numbers before the last couple of years, as French points out.
8. It Was Apparently Interpreted by Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and Top Advisor Steven Miller To Cover Those With Green Cards. When questions began to stream in about whether the order applied to legal residents from the seven countries at issue, the Department of Homeland Security immediately said yes. Then, apparently, Bannon and Miller overruled them, leading to confusion. Here’s the CNN report

http://arbeeresponds2.blogspot.com/2017/02/trump-immigration-law-transcript.html

TRUMP IMMIGRATION LAW (TRANSCRIPT)


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. The visa-issuance process plays a crucial role in detecting individuals with terrorist ties and stopping them from entering the United States. Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans. And while the visa-issuance process was reviewed and amended after the September 11 attacks to better detect would-be terrorists from receiving visas, these measures did not stop attacks by foreign nationals who were admitted to the United States.

Numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving visitor, student, or employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee resettlement program. Deteriorating conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster, and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use any means possible to enter the United States. The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.

In order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and to prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.

Sec. 3. Suspension of Issuance of Visas and Other Immigration Benefits to Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall immediately conduct a review to determine the information needed from any country to adjudicate any visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual seeking the benefit is who the individual claims to be and is not a security or public-safety threat.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determination of the information needed for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 30 days of the date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence.

(c) To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening of foreign nationals, and to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists or criminals, pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens from countries referred to in section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, of such persons for 90 days from the date of this order (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas).

(d) Immediately upon receipt of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request all foreign governments that do not supply such information to start providing such information regarding their nationals within 60 days of notification.

(e) After the 60-day period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion on a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of foreign nationals (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas) from countries that do not provide the information requested pursuant to subsection (d) of this section until compliance occurs.

(f) At any point after submitting the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment.

(g) Notwithstanding a suspension pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or pursuant to a Presidential proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may, on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked.

(h) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this orderwithin 30 days of the date of this order, a second report within 60 daysof the date of this order, a third report within 90 days of the date of this order, and a fourth report within 120 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 4. Implementing Uniform Screening Standards for All Immigration Programs(a) The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall implement a program, as part of the adjudication process for immigration benefits, to identify individuals seeking to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis with the intent to cause harm, or who are at risk of causing harm subsequent to their admission. This program will include the development of a uniform screening standard and procedure, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identifying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that the applicant is who the applicant claims to be; a process to evaluate the applicant’s likelihood of becoming a positively contributing member of society and the applicant’s ability to make contributions to the national interest; and a mechanism to assess whether or not the applicant has the intent to commit criminal or terrorist acts after entering the United States.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of this directive within 60 days of the date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 5. Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017(a) The Secretary of State shall suspend the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days. During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication process to determine what additional procedures should be taken to ensure that those approved for refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures. Refugee applicants who are already in the USRAP process may be admitted upon the initiation and completion of these revised procedures. Upon the date that is 120 days after the date of this order, the Secretary of State shall resume USRAP admissions only for nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that such additional procedures are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of the United States.

(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.

(c) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest.

(d) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.

(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest — including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution, when admitting the person would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement, or when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship — and it would not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States.

(f) The Secretary of State shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the directive in subsection (b) of this section regarding prioritization of claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution within 100 days of the date of this order and shall submit a second report within 200 days of the date of this order.

(g) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.

Sec. 6. Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of InadmissibilityThe Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority in section 212 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182, relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing memoranda.

Sec. 7. Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry-exit tracking system for all travelers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive contained in subsection (a) of this section. The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the date of this order. Further, the Secretary shall submit a report every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational.

Sec. 8. Visa Interview Security. (a) The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1222, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions.

(b) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fellows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that non-immigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected.

Sec. 9. Visa Validity ReciprocityThe Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment. If a country does not treat United States nationals seeking nonimmigrant visas in a reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by the foreign country, to the extent practicable.

Sec. 10. Transparency and Data Collection(a) To be more transparent with the American people, and to more effectively implement policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available within 180 days, and every 180 days thereafter:

(i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, affiliation, or material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national security reasons since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later;

(ii) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and

(iii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including honor killings, in the United States by foreign nationals, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and

(iv) any other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses.

(b) The Secretary of State shall, within one year of the date of this order, provide a report on the estimated long-term costs of the USRAP at the Federal, State, and local levels.

Sec. 11. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Ads make our site possible but they can be frustrating. That’s why we’re trying something new.

You can now read The Daily Wire without ads for 3 months absolutely free.


Already a Member? Login Now