"SCUUUUUSE ME...

 So, the Democrats week of glory has been etched into the pages of history, for whatever history is worth.  I feel that we have fully immersed our people into a psychotic world of split personality disorders.  One planet made to give the impression of two completely different, mirrored, piles of rock in the middle of our galaxy.  Two years ago, almost to the day, my blog was addressing the same sentiment as today’s blog entry, “We miss the why because we always want to blame the other guy in lieu of seeing all sides of the matter, including our part (as in all contests) our side. Denial of history has one absolute result - it will repeat itself.

{December, 2016 http://arbeeresponds2.blogspot.com/2016/12/a-difference-in-reality.html the other planets’ view.}

The principle speakers of this cleansing, blaming extravaganza, would have the Trump Presidency reaching back through time.  The distress of history is being bent, twisted, turned and changed by rhetoric designed to mitigate the actual failures of the past.

Believe it or not… Trump was not involved in: The slowest economic recovery, and the longest since the great depression of the 1920’s; the loss of manufacturing base and the jobs that were lost during the Obama regime; the strangling, job costing regulatory over-reach of government; the belief that our national GDP would never again reach over the .2.5% mark and would be our new norm; the Benghazi fiasco; the mass influx of illegal border crossing into our country; the loss of medical coverage for millions of people; the high cost of fuel that increased cost of goods across our country; the mistake of calling ISIS a junior faction and allowing the growth of their Caliphate ( and the subsequent horrors); the politization of our legal system; the divisive nature of racism interjected at every opportunity; and finally the illegal use of the FISA court, the FBI to spy on an incumbent President and his staff.  Did I forget to mention the lives lost in combat due to the restrictions placed on our military i.e., “not to engage the enemy until fired upon”, those restrictions allowed the mid-Eastern wars to continue far past what would have been possible and reasonable. 

That was the photo of time during the Obama-Biden administration.  Want a rerun of those times?  Not I!

The accusations being leveled against our President are more like a list of what the Democrats wish he had done, and didn’t.  Since his election he has stood up for our country, our jobs, our manufacturing, our agriculture, our economy on every level.  He has brought our troops home while still achieving our goals; he has lowered drug costs; he has returned manufacturing and jobs back into our country; he untied the handcuffs of regulation and taxation that chased our companies to go elsewhere; he has restructured trade agreements in ways that benefit our employment and sector incomes; his policies brought about the lowest unemployment levels for women and all racial groups nationwide; brought our country back to a position of strength internationally; brought us into a never before position of energy independence.

A complete list of what really happened while under congressional resistance to his Presidency:                 https://arbeeresponds2.blogspot.com/2020/08/what-did-he-do-this-time.html
History matters:
https://arbeeresponds2.blogspot.com/2017/08/like-it-or-not-point-your-finger-at.html
https://arbeeresponds2.blogspot.com/2017/01/2016-in-rear-view-mirror.html

GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY, OUR SOCIETY, OUR FIRST RESPONDERS, GUIDE OUR VOTES LORD..

https://www.facebook.com/MyownLogic

IMMIGRATION AND THE RULE OF LAW

http://www.westernjournalism.com/democrats-accused-of-breaking-the-law-on-live-tv-during-convention/

How is this going to work out?  Let’s just imagine what could be the worst outcome of this election coming to fruition.  As the first woman president as she takes the oath of office,” "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."    

 Will she be able to audibly say the magical “I do affirm (or swear) to?”

Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. 

We all know those provisions have been sorely abused by the current administration when illegal, undocumented non-citizens come into our country without our invite.  The Democrat Executive Branch practice of allowing catch and release, sanctuary cities and flat out ignoring current immigration laws have prevailed. 

With the giant push to gain voters from the Latino segment of our population (legal or not), The Democrat Party has persistently pushed back against the existing laws regarding immigration.  What a way to increase the voter base.  It is no longer a question of what is best for our country or setting the example to our society that abiding by the laws are important.  It has become a method of acquiring power for the future and it has very little altruistic value. 

Approximately 70% of our population thinks our country is headed downhill or in the wrong direction.  There are approximately 42% of registered voters calling themselves Democrat and 39% Republican.  That’s just about an equal amount.  How can our blatant law breaking be taking place and why do we allow it to continue.  Breaking the law seems to be condoned by 42% of the voting population.  Why does the American electorate see fit to elect an Executive Branch in charge who ignores our laws? How is it we keep electing folks more interested in keeping their office and getting votes than they are in making our country strong, vibrant, economically sound and protected?  Somewhere, somehow we have become so lazy and uninvolved that our ability to make better choices has evolved into national gullibility. 

I don’t know about you but I’m pretty careful about making sure the door to my house is locked.  I’m careful who I invite into my house.  I don’t want any probability of someone coming in uninvited, unknown or with criminal intent.  How is it racist to want the same consideration for my country’s hearth?  If you come into my home uninvited or when I’m not looking, that’s breaking and entering and that is against the law.  The doorway into our home is open to those we invite to come in and when you enter we have a right to expect a certain set of courtesy and decorum.  If we rule in our home, we should be able to expect you to follow those rules or make the choice to leave.  If I invite you into my home you do not have title or ownership.  Be honest America, how different from our own individual position should our nation be?  If you refuse to disrespect the rules of our home, does asking you to leave make me inhumane?  If you refuse to leave, would I be within my rights to summon the police to remove you?  The answer is, yes, of course.  The same is true for our nation.  The problem with our nation calling for the police to protect our home, they are unavailable.

In order to make the GOP conservatives into absolute enemies of all that is good, it becomes necessary to interpret the desire for a rule of law into the divisive terms.  To make themselves appear kind and loving, labels of racist, bigot, hater, uncaring, selfish and any other derogatory terminology that suits the agenda are gleefully put into use to describe the other side.  Truth and fact matter not, the power of perception is the rule.  There is an old adage: “fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice shame on me”.  We have already had a full taste of the second bite of the apple.  I might add a third part to the above mentioned adage.  I’ve let you fool me twice, if I allow you to fool me again, lock me up for I have truly gone insane.

I recently listened to a sermon that suggested folks of a certain age should stop scaring our children with all the gloom and doom talk.  I would like to know how many parents would be silent if they observed their child headed into a street full of traffic.  Do we advise children when to be careful and to be aware of dangers?  I’m pretty sure we do.  Those are all common sense warnings, in most cases derived from experience.  Parents not caring for their children in a responsible manner are in jeopardy of jail time, fines or both.  A thought for you young’uns out there, we’re not trying to scare you, we just want you to be aware.  Without enforcing and practicing the rule of law, expect anarchy.

 Pray for discernment, knowledge, and safety.  God bless our country.  Love your neighbor.

OMG HAVE WE BEEN DECEIVED?

CLINTON CASH a you-tube movie about the Clintons climb to wealth.  This movie is about an hour long.  Time well spent.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td2pyyCau30

 

This was so unbelievable and so full of food for thought, if you are not a Mensa genius it will boggle the mind.  This could not have any validity, but it does. Like most informational things today, there is most likely some stretch going on so it’s up to you to do your own fact searching.  I have only done a minimal amount, but one source I checked with gave it some validity.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/apr/26/fact-checking-april-26-shows-clinton-cash/

I'm one of the first to admit that my man Donald appears to be a bit narcissistic but we've proved we can survive 8 years of that personality defect. The choice on the other side is very much akin to what third world countries have to contend with and I’m not so sure how well we will survive if we go in that direction. We have the opportunity to elect what I (if this movie has validity) would classify as an opportunistic sociopath and her enabler. Before you get all bent out of shape, educate yourself without blinding your mind with your side, my side clingy and sheep like ignorance. 

High intelligence and communication skills give some folks a real ability of persuasion.  If that’s connected to a strong drive for achieving power and the personality defect of a sociopath, we have the ultimate con artist.  For the last thirty years I have heard all the conspiracy theories regarding the “Clinton Machine” and for the last thirty years I have sprinkled salt on them and forgot them.  Like most of us, the thought of someone being able to fake their way into the Presidency of the United States was way past reality.  The one thing in our favor is that most people can be fooled some of the time but all the people cannot be fooled all the time.  We need to be sure we are smart enough to salvage what is ours.

Watch this movie.  If it raises questions, look for answers.  Just don’t trust there to be a pot of gold waiting for you.  Some rainbows exist only in the mirage of hope.    

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td2pyyCau30

Pray for discernment, our country and your neighbor.  God Bless you and our country.

BILL DOESN'T LIE

I listened to one of the most talented speakers of our time as he used his magical abilities to paint pictures in our mind.  He painted the picture of a modern Joan of Arc fighting courageously for those in need.  He spoke of a nimble quick mind surrounded with the heart of gold.  He told a story about the perfect politician for both then and now.  I am absolutely certain that every one of his claims those positive exploits can and will be substantiated throughout the next few months. 

One thing the past has shown us is that “Bill cannot tell a lie”.  If Bill says he didn’t, he didn’t and if Bill says Hillary is all good with no bad we are almost forced into believing that scenario.  Bill did make a little tiny mistake towards the end of his eloquent flowery painting.  He asked the question of the American voters.  How can we square what we heard in his speech with what we heard at the RNC just the previous week?  We can’t, and like he said, one of the Hillary depictions must be a falsehood.

The problem with lies of omission is they are very hard to disagree with.  You cannot disagree with something you don’t even hear.  As usual, the use of semantics makes it easy to say “Bill doesn’t lie”.  Hillary may well have done all those great things with great altruistic purpose, but some of the other things we have seen and been witness to didn’t make it into the painting.  One problem with that practice is somewhere in time and space. the omissions are a glaring reality.   There is an old adage in play and it is this “the truth will out”.  The missing colors to the painting set before us are pretty much of the same hue, not good.

Most of us are aware of the current missing items:  

·         Benghazi (a video did it)

·         Missing e-mails (30,000 compared to Richard Nixons missing 6 minutes of taped conversations)

·         Playing fast and loose with classified documents (General Petraeus called guilty and lost position)

·         Lying to Congress (“ I never had classified material on the personal computer)

·         Possible use of the Clinton Foundation as a personal slush fund ( Bill and Hillarys speaking fees took a giant increase, over $26 million from Clinton Foundation donors; donations tied to positive government decisions in favor of donors)   

This trend did not appear magically in the last decade.  Here are some others that are there for you to peruse: 1978 $100,000. Profit on a $1,000 investment in cattle futures (I think Martha Stewart served time for some similar act); 1980’s Castle Grande drafting of misleading documents to deceive bank examiners; somehow documentation of her complicity in the former was somehow lost and didn’t reappear until the investigation had closed (sound familiar); Travelgate; throwing women under the bus during Bills sexual scandals; verbally abusive to White House and security staff; there is also some question as to her role in the suicide of Vince Foster  What a little sweetheart she is.

One of the things that Mr. Bill said is that Hillary is one of the smartest people he knows.  Smart doesn’t mean you are moral and it certainly doesn’t mean mental acuity can’t be used to attain wealth and personal power.  Hillary states that when the Clintons left the White House and Bills presidency they were flat broke.  What part did her being smart play in going from zip to $120 million in just one decade’s time?  Warren Buffet would be proud of her business acumen.

Hillary in her younger period was so enamored with the Saul Alinsky model of sowing discontent and taking down governments (Rules for Radicals) that she carried on a correspondence with him.  I would suggest that you look up the tenants of that writing and realize that is a part of Hillary’s deeply rooted belief system.  Alinskys ideology is based on creating revolution by anger and division.  I have to think the diviseive methods we have witnessed fit right into his methodology.  I might note that we have just completed 7 ½ years of governance under another one of his close followers.  It’s pretty hard to say that we are more united as a country than we were in 2001. Transforming every difference into have and have not’s has the effect of changing reconcilable difference into civil disobedience and violence.  Nice job guys in proving Saul knew what he was talking about.  American society can be brought into the socialist fold.

We, at least, were spared explanation, excuses, or statements common to Clinton defense methods.  Missing was Mr. Clintons famous defense of “ I did not have ___ with that woman”, or Hillary’s “everybody else did it” and “I didn’t know it was (classified).  I guess no defense was needed other than just plain ___________________________________               (silence, the soothing sound of crickets and birds chirping).

Pray for our country, pray for discernment.  Seek the truth.

God bless our country and God bless each of you.